# Cover *** **INSTANT ACCESS FORMS** [MF01 Lecture Make-up Form](https://forms.office.com/r/xd7qi6pcC1) | For instructors only. [MF02 Course Feedback Form](https://forms.office.com/r/KAmmicyVbG) | For instructors and students. [MF03 Feedback Form](https://forms.office.com/r/vZgvAjRYBs) | For everybody, even if you are anonymous. [MF04 Issue Tracking Form](https://forms.office.com/r/T0u4X4krV3) | For everybody, if you are experiencing any problem. [MF05 Danışman Tercih Formu | Advisor Preference Form](https://forms.office.com/r/xWhTWBP0Yi) | For Master and PhD Students. # Preface The Field Manual for Fellows and Members of Department of Management Information Systems\ Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences\ İzmir Bakırçay University, Turkey Prof. H. Kemal İlter, Ph.D.\ Chair 2023 **IMPORTANT** The Field Manual is a manifesto/operations manual for the Department of Management Information Systems, it is **not a lexicon** for the term of scientific field of MIS. # Prologue Chapter 1 Organizational culture is a unique property of an academic department to create and boost scientific value for humanity. Our department is established recently (2018) and we are willing to embed scientific best practices, and to create an efficient academic climate and culture in the *Department of Management Information Systems* (MIS Dept.). With the *Field Manual*, we are trying to create a strategic framework to support main processes of the department. In the *Field Manual*, readers can find various subjects which are related to departmental strategy and viewpoints, intrinsic workflows and approaches, implicit rules and regulations, current functions and actions. For many people this document may seemed to be an effort for nothing, a mental waste, or a weird point of view which try to create an artificial social architecture. However, such opinions will also be exist in the future regardless of efforts to create a knowledge-based society. On the other hand, this document reflects a critical thinking exercise for the system which is based on verbalization. Document-based systems are more powerful and more sustainable as the reader can recognize their effects on various world-wide practices. So, we should create a well-documented architecture for an academic department to create more value for the society. ## 1.1. Values Our core values are based on the concepts declared below to get works done! They are bound to all processes related to the department. **OPEN.** Open relationships between agents and parties. **FREE.** Freedom of thought and speech in all processes. **PROACTIVE.** Getting works done proactively. **CREATIVE.** Making things as we dream. **RESPONSIBLE AND ACCOUNTABLE.** Awareness of responsibilities of actions and obligations to report, explain, or justify processes. ## 1.2. Scientific Viewpoint We are, as researchers, doing science to arrive at knowledge and seeking new ideas which can be answers for questions. In the department, our main research domain is management information systems (plural) which includes mutual scientific areas and academic disciplines. Accordingly, Department of Management Information Systems is a multidisciplinary academic unit at Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences of University of Bakırçay. To do science is to follow a prescribed method to arrive at knowledge. As Rossiter (2013) notes that the scientific method is not a belief system or religious dogma, but rather a manner of thinking and working towards more complete knowledge of the world. It has been proven to be extremely successful in: * explaining the world as we observe it; * predicting what can be further observed, e.g. new observations, new locations, repeat observations, the effect of interventions; * engineering, i.e. building things that work. Science is not prescriptive – it cannot say what *ought* to be done. It can, however, point out the probable consequences of certain actions, as objectively as possible. Therefore, we encourage and support our colleagues to let them for leveraging their personal limits and improving their scientific visions in all sense. ## 1.3. Educational Viewpoint Our main objective in education is to create an environment that fosters creativity while ensuring a foundational level of scientific knowledge. The department offers four programs at different levels: an undergraduate program, two master's programs (one with a thesis and another without), and a PhD program. The curricula for these programs are carefully designed to support self-actualization, strengthen professional viewpoint, and encourage knowledge-based creativity at both theoretical and practical levels. In addition to this, there is an online evaluation form available for all MIS courses. We are actively seeking feedback to continuously improve course performance for everyone. ## 1.4. Administrative Viewpoint Academic administration is a branch of a university or college where employees are responsible for the maintenance and supervision of the institution. These employees are distinct from the faculty or academics, although some individuals may have joint responsibilities. Various administrative structures exist in nearly all academic institutions. Notably, fewer schools worldwide are governed by employees who also engage in academic or scholarly work. On the other hand, as a newly established academic unit of the university, we do not have additional personnel to assign specific administrative roles. Therefore, we must handle almost all administrative tasks ourselves. To address this, several commissions have been set up, at least as a short-term solution, to manage specific tasks. All members of the department are eager to assist the chair's office in establishing a decentralized departmental administration that aligns with the department's perspectives. ## 1.5. People **Faculty** Prof. Abdulkadir Hızıroğlu, Ph.D., Department Chair Prof. H. Kemal İlter, Ph.D. Prof. Erman Coşkun, Ph.D. Assoc. Prof. Emine Uçar, Ph.D., Vice Chair Assoc. Prof. Onur Doğan, Ph.D. Assoc. Prof. Serhat Peker, Ph.D. Asst. Prof. Hunaida Avvad, Ph.D. Asst. Prof. Fares Dael, Ph.D. Asst. Prof. Ourania Areta Hızıroğlu, Ph.D. **Research Assistants** RA Ekin Akkol, Ph.D. Candidate RA Ali Mert Erdoğan, Ph.D. Candidate RA Burak Keskin # Administration Chapter 2 Our department has no special administrative office, we are communicating in the way of nature! Departmental issues are discussed in the departmental board meetings which are holding at least one session per month. Faculty members have rights to vote on decisions while we are seeking a consensus. ## 2.1. Code of Ethics and Code of Research There are two comprehensive examples which can be considered to define department's code of ethics. We hope somebody need to write it in the future for the department itself. Until then, these two seem to be meaningful for the department. * ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct, * Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice, There is a well written code of research from AIS, maybe we can put some issues on the table for Turkish academia soon. * AIS Code of Research Conduct, ## 2.2. Delegation and Tasking Chair's office is the main contact point and it is responsible for ALL activities of the department in the official sense. Assigning various tasks to members of the department is one of the tasks of the chair's office. All assignments should be ready to discuss, present, or share at the due date by the respective members. *Official working groups* **AEC - Academic Encouragement Evaluation and Control Committee** * Prof. Abdulkadir Hızıroğlu, Ph.D., Department Chair * Assoc. Prof. Onur Doğan, Ph.D. * Assoc. Prof. Serhat Peker, Ph.D. **ERC - ERASMUS and International Education Committee** * Asst. Prof. Ourania Areta Hızıroğlu, Ph.D. * Asst. Prof. Hunaida Avvad, Ph.D. * Asst. Prof. Fares Dael, Ph.D. **IBC - Internship and Vocational Business Training Committee** * Assoc. Prof. Onur Doğan, Ph.D. * Asst. Prof. Ourania Areta Hızıroğlu, Ph.D. * Asst. Prof. Serhat Peker, Ph.D. **TEC - Student Transfer, Course Exemption, and Curriculum Adaptation Committee** * Assoc. Prof. Emine Uçar, Ph.D., Vice Chair * Asst. Prof. Hunaida Avvad, Ph.D. * Asst. Prof. Serhat Peker, Ph.D. ## 2.3. Policies The Department of Management Information Systems developed written policies in order to set a clear shared expectation for processes that we will hold ourselves accountable to the school (see [Appendices](/appendices)). ## 2.4. Communication We communicate each other via mobile phone calls, text messages, and e-mail messages. Additionally some mobile apps like **WhatsApp** are really helpful for sharing instant ideas, photos, or short documents. In the professional sense, we are using **Microsoft 365***.* Our department has an **X** (Twitter) account, [@ybs\_bakircayedu](https://twitter.com/ybs_bakircayedu) and an **Instagram** account, [@ybs\_bakircayedu](https://www.instagram.com/ybs_bakircayedu/) to share some important topics and valuable links with students. ## 2.5. Websites and Content Management System We have two websites; the official one, is integral part of the corporate identity and the chair's portal, is dedicated to more daily functions of the department. We are using Mediawiki as a content management system (CMS) and a website. All information about the department is always updated on the chair's portal, .

Document movements between parties.

# Research Chapter 3 We are working on various topics of management information systems (MIS) such as; information concepts, digital transformation, decision making, system concepts and principles, management and strategy, technology adoption and diffusion, sociology and organization behavior, business analytics, big data, etc. Some items give a clue about the research performance of the department. For 2023, they are as follows; articles published: 8, paper in conferences: 3, books/book chapters: 3, research projects: 1. # Rules and Regulations Chapter 4 This is a bit of shame to feel that there is a necessity for writing some of rules and regulations which are related to academia and university education in this manual. On the other hand, there were a lot of disorders, manipulations, confusions, or mess in the past for academic units in universities generally. Unfortunately university education is not ideal yet. So we want to put a clear conceptual construction on these to avoid some difficulties for all parties specifically in the view of education. First and foremost, on behalf of the Department of Management Information Systems, it's important to note that we adhere to a set of instructions, rules, and regulations as mandated by various regulatory bodies. These include the Council of Higher Education, the University of Bakırçay, and the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. Secondly, faculty members in our department have a range of responsibilities, which are equally important and include: * Conducting research, * Instructing courses, which encompasses student advisory roles, * Participating in departmental meetings and activities, * Representing the department in specific scenarios, and * Actively contributing to the management and administration of the department. ## 4.1. Conducting Research We are all researchers and conducting research is a natural part of our lives. ## 4.2. Instructing Courses There are some restrictions and regulations about the process of instructing courses for the faculty. For each course instructed, the faculty member should deliver; * SYLLABUS, at the beginning of the semester (See Syllabus checklist). * EXAM PACKAGE to put to the departmental archive, at the end of the semester (See Package checklist). * COURSE REVIEW REPORT, at the end of the semester (See Review Report checklist). In general there are some default rules for the process of instructing the course, such as; * Each lecture should be begun and ended with the correct time according to the weekly course schedule. * A lecture which couldn’t be done due to some unavoidable circumstances should be reported to the chair’s office immediately (See [#MF01 MIS - Lecture Make-up Form](https://forms.office.com/r/xd7qi6pcC1)). ## 4.3. Academic Advisory During the undergraduate education, the academic staff are called "advisors" who are assigned to lead the students in the subjects such as course registration, planning of four-year undergraduate education, solution of the problems encountered during this process. Advisory is a process that must be followed carefully by both the advisor and the student. Academic Advisory Guide is designed to make this process more efficient for everybody. (see [Undergraduate Academic Advisory Guide](/appendices/undergraduate-academic-advisory-guide))
# Curricula Chapter 5 ## 5.1. MIS Undergraduate Program {% embed url="" %} ## 5.2. MIS Master's Program {% embed url="" %} ## 5.3. MIS PhD Program {% embed url="" %} ## 5.4. Business Intelligence and Data Analytics Master's Program {% embed url="" %} # Activities Chapter 6 ## 6.1. Research Seminar Series Research outputs. Members of the department present their research outputs in monthly seminars. All researchers are welcome for this open discussion platform. Coordinator: Assoc. Prof. Onur Doğan, Ph.D. Coming Spring 2024. ## 6.2. Workshops Hands-on-experience. Participants use some research tools in workshops for hands-on-experience with scientific approaches in MIS Workshops. Coordinator: Asst. Prof. Fares Dael, Ph.D. Seven workshops have been accomplished. {% embed url="" %} ## 6.3. MIS Talks New ideas with storytelling. Invited speakers give interesting speeches about their experiences in business life, a project recently completed, or a product newly introduced. Coordinator: Asst. Prof. Hunaida Avvad, Ph.D. Coming Spring 2024. ## 6.4. MIS in Dept(h) Live sessions. Members of the department talk about MIS topics, biweekly. Coordinator: Asst. Prof. Serhat Peker, Ph.D. Coming Spring 2024. ## 6.5. MIS Industry Seminars on new technologies for professionals. Coordinator: Asst. Prof. Ourania Areta, Ph.D. Coming Spring 2024. ## 6.6. MIS Professional Education Courses Coordinator: Prof. Dr. Abdulkadir Hızıroğlu, Ph.D. Coming Spring 2024. # Appendices # Related Occupations Appendix A **Computer and Information Research Scientists** Computer and information research scientists invent and design new approaches to computing technology and find innovative uses for existing technology. They study and solve complex problems in computing for business, medicine, science, and other fields. **Computer Network Architects** Computer network architects design and build data communication networks, including local area networks (LANs), wide area networks (WANs), and intranets. These networks range from small connections between two offices to next-generation networking capabilities such as a cloud infrastructure that serves multiple customers. **Computer Programmers** Computer programmers write and test code that allows computer applications and software programs to function properly. They turn the program designs created by software developers and engineers into instructions that a computer can follow. **Computer Support Specialists** Computer support specialists provide help and advice to people and organizations using computer software or equipment. Some, called computer network support specialists, support information technology (IT) employees within their organization. Others, called computer user support specialists, assist non-IT users who are having computer problems. **Computer Systems Analysts** Computer systems analysts study an organization’s current computer systems and procedures and design information systems solutions to help the organization operate more efficiently and effectively. They bring business and information technology (IT) together by understanding the needs and limitations of both. **Database Administrators** Database administrators (DBAs) use specialized software to store and organize data, such as financial information and customer shipping records. They make sure that data are available to users and are secure from unauthorized access. **Information Security Analysts** Information security analysts plan and carry out security measures to protect an organization’s computer networks and systems. Their responsibilities are continually expanding as the number of cyberattacks increases. **Network and Computer Systems Administrators** Computer networks are critical parts of almost every organization. Network and computer systems administrators are responsible for the day-to-day operation of these networks. **Software Developers** Software developers are the creative minds behind computer programs. Some develop the applications that allow people to do specific tasks on a computer or another device. Others develop the underlying systems that run the devices or that control networks. **Web Developers** Web developers design and create websites. They are responsible for the look of the site. They are also responsible for the site’s technical aspects, such as its performance and capacity, which are measures of a website’s speed and how much traffic the site can handle. In addition, web developers may create content for the site. # Underlying Disciplines, Concepts, and Theories Appendix B *Adapted from* Gordon B. Davis. 2000. Information Systems Conceptual Foundations: Looking Backward and Forward. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC9 WG9.3 International Conference on Home Oriented Informatics and Telematics,: Information, Technology and Society (HOIT ’00), Andy Sloane and Felix van Rijn (Eds.). Kluwer, B.V., Deventer, The Netherlands, The Netherlands, 61-82. **Psychology** Theories of human behavior, Motivation theories, Theory of reasoned action. **Cognitive Psychology** Human information processing, Human cognition, Expertise, Artificial intelligence, Cognitive style, Creativity, Knowledge, Cognitive representations/visualization, Human-machine interfaces. **Sociology/Organization Behavior** Nature of work (knowledge work, clerical work, etc.), Governance theories, Organization design concepts, Process models, Culture. **Technology Adoption/Diffusion** Adaptive structration, Social network theory, Actor network theory, Social influence, Organization change, Organization learning, Trust, Ethics. **Management/Strategy** Strategy, Innovation, Competitive advantage, Resource view of firm, Knowledge management, Risk management, Evaluation, Outsourcing. **Economics** Principal-agent theory, Transaction cost economics, Productivity, Information economics, Social welfare, Adverse selection, Value of information, Incomplete contracting, Intermediation. **System Concepts and Principles** Artificial systems, Requisite variety, Soft systems, Complexity, Control theory-cybernetics, Socio-cybernetic theory of acts, Task/technology fit (equifinality), System economics (reuse), Maintenance of systems (negative entropy), Process theory, System models. **Communications** Media choice, Collaborative work, Speech acts theory. **Decision Making** Behavioral decision making, Normative decision models, Group decision making, Neural networks/genetic algorithms. **Information Concepts** Mathematical theory of communications, Quality, errors, and bias concepts, Value of information, Semantics, Semiotics (theory of signs).
# Undergraduate Academic Advisory Guide Appendix Ca As of January 5, 2022 During the undergraduate education, the academic staff are called "advisors" who are assigned to lead the students in the subjects such as course registration, planning of four-year undergraduate education, solution of the problems encountered during this process. Advisory is a process that must be followed carefully by both the advisor and the student. This guide is designed to make this process more efficient for everybody. 1. The advisor is responsible for guiding the student in academic matters. In particular, first-class advisors should also help the student to be familiar with the campus and the business school. 2. The student must feel guided and can easily communicate with the advisor when it is necessary. 3. The advisor and the student must conduct face-to-face or virtual interviews and situational assessments at least twice during a semester (preferably at the beginning of the semester and at the end of the semester). 4. The advisor should keep a file for each student. This file should contain information about the student such as the student's contact information, courses taken at the beginning of the semester, attendance in these courses at the end of the semester, academic issues faced by the student during the semester, a copy of the petitions related to these issues, and a copy of the decision of the board. 5. Advisor should be informed about the university regulations. In addition, the advisor is expected to know the decisions and practices of the relevant academic unit, to monitor and implement the changes made. 6. The advisor is expected to have mastered the four-year course curriculum and the requirements of the curriculum of the program concerned. In this way, it is necessary to plan the course schedule of the student appropriately and to select the areas that the student is interested in from the elective courses. 7. At the beginning of the academic term, the advisor evaluates the registration in which the student is enrolled and, if appropriate, approves, if not, requests the student to make the necessary corrections. In order to minimize the problem of communication between the student and the advisor in this process, it is expected that at least two full days of registration will be made in the advisor's office for the approval of the registration, and these days and hours should be announced to the students in advance. The advisor becomes fully responsible for the student's registration from the moment the student approves the record, and this responsibility continues until the end of the period concerned. 8. The advisor should serve as a bridge between the student and other academic and administrative units (student affairs, relevant department headships, chair's office, etc.). The student must pass all petitions to the advisor in academic matters first. The advisor should assess the situation and communicate the advisory opinion containing this evaluation to the department secretary concerned with the petition of the student. The advisor's memo must clearly state the student's credentials (name, surname, department, class, number, etc.), what the student's petition is about, and the reasons for his or her own opinion. In addition, the advisor's opinion regarding the student's situation or the result of the decision of the faculty committee must be followed by the advisor and the final solution for the student must be notified by the advisor. 9. In case that there is no problem about the time in the petition process, the advisor should notify the secretariat of the related department within maximum 3 working days of giving the student petition. If this is overdue, the advisor is expected to provide a written explanation for overdue reason. 10. The advisor should keep a copy of all documents related to the student in the student file. # Lisans Akademik Danışmanlık Rehberi Appendix Cb As of January 5, 2022 Lisans öğrenimi boyunca öğrencilerin ders kayıtları, dört yıllık lisans öğrenimin planlanması ve bu süreç boyunca karşılaşılan sorunların çözümü gibi konularda öğrenciye yol göstermek amacıyla atanan akademik personele “akademik danışman” (bu rehberde Danışman olarak kullanılacaktır) adı verilmektedir. Danışmanlık, hem danışman hem de öğrenci için dikkatle takip edilmesi gereken bir süreçtir. Bu rehber, Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Bölümü'nün akademik danışmanlık sürecini daha verimli hale getirmek için hazırlanmıştır. 1. Danışman, akademik konularda öğrenciye rehberlik etmekle yükümlüdür. Özellikle birinci sınıf danışmanları, öğrencinin yerleşkemizi ve fakültemizi tanımasına ve yeni ortama alışmasına da yardımcı olmalıdır. 2. Öğrenci, ihtiyacı olduğu durumlarda danışmanı tarafından yönlendirileceğini ve danışmanıyla kolaylıkla iletişim kurabileceğini hissetmelidir. 3. Danışman ve öğrenci, bir yarıyıl boyunca en az iki defa (tercihen yarıyıl başında ve yarıyıl sonunda) yüz-yüze görüşme ve durum değerlendirmesi yapmalıdır. 4. Danışman, her öğrencisiyle ilgili bir dosya tutmalıdır. Bu dosyada, öğrencinin iletişim bilgileri, ilgili dönem başında aldığı dersler, dönem sonunda bu derslerdeki geçme kalma durumu, dönem boyunca öğrencinin karşılaştığı akademik sorunlar, bu sorunlarla ilgili verilen dilekçelerin bir kopyası ve dilekçenin sonucunu bildiren yönetim kurulu kararının bir kopyası gibi öğrenciye dair bilgiler bulunmalıdır. 5. Danışman, üniversitenin lisans eğitim-öğretim yönetmeliğine hakim olmalıdır. Ayrıca, danışmanın, ilgili akademik birimin karar ve uygulamalarını bilmesi, yapılan değişiklikleri izlemesi ve uygulaması beklenir. 6. Danışmanın, ilgili programın dört yıllık ders müfredatına ve bu müfredatın gereklerine hakim olması beklenir. Bu sayede öğrencinin ders programının uygun bir şekilde planlanması ve seçmeli dersler arasından öğrencinin ilgi duyduğu alanların seçilmesi sağlanmalıdır. 7. Akademik yarıyıl başında danışman, öğrencinin kayıt olduğu programı değerlendirir, uygun ise onaylar, değil ise öğrenciden gerekli düzeltmeleri yapmasını talep eder. Bu süreçte öğrenci ile danışman arasında iletişim probleminin en aza indirilmesi için kayıt haftasında en az iki tam gün boyunca kayıt onaylarının danışmanın ofisinde yüzyüze yapılması, bu gün ve saatlerin öğrencilere önceden ilan edilmesi beklenir. Danışman, öğrencinin kaydını onayladığı andan itibaren öğrencinin programından tamamıyla sorumlu hale gelmektedir ve bu sorumluluğu ilgili dönemin sonuna kadar devam etmektedir. 8. Danışman, öğrenci ile diğer akademik ve idari birimler (öğrenci işleri, ilgili bölüm başkanlıkları ve fakülte dekanlığı vb.) arasında köprü görevi yapmalıdır. Öğrenci, akademik konularda tüm dilekçelerini öncelikle danışmanına iletmelidir. Danışman durumu değerlendirmeli ve bu değerlendirmeyi içeren danışmanlık görüşünü, öğrencinin dilekçesiyle birlikte bir üst yazıyla ilgili bölüm başkanlığı sekreterliğine iletmelidir. Danışmanın dilekçesi, öğrencinin kimlik bilgilerini (ad, soyad), eğitimle ilgili bilgileri (bölüm, sınıf, numara vb.), öğrencinin dilekçesinin ne hakkında olduğunu ve kendi görüşünü nedenleriyle birlikte açıkça belirtmelidir. Ayrıca, öğrencinin durumuyla ilgili Bölüm Başkanlığı görüşü ya da Fakülte kurulu kararının sonucu da danışman tarafından takip edilmeli ve dilekçenin sonucu öğrenciye danışman tarafından bildirilmelidir. 9. Dilekçe süreçlerinde zamanla ilgili bir problem yaşanmaması açısından, danışman, dilekçe kendisine ulaştıktan sonra en fazla 3 işgünü içinde, değerlendirilmiş dilekçeyi ilgili bölüm başkanlığı sekreterliğine iletmelidir. Bu sürenin aşılması durumunda, danışmandan sürenin neden aşıldığına dair yazılı bir açıklama sunması beklenir. 10. Danışman, öğrenciyle ilgili her türlü evrakın bir kopyasını öğrenci dosyasında tutmalıdır. # Exam Policies Appendix D **Policy on Administration of Exams** The MIS Department expects all courses to include appropriate procedures for evaluating student performance. For many undergraduate courses, these procedures will include a final exam, a final paper or project, or some other cumulative activity appropriate to the discipline and to the course. Midterm and final examinations, whether in an on-campus or an online course, must be given during the one-week period set aside by the University for this purpose; likewise, final examinations must be given at the time specified on the Faculty's Midterm and Final Examination Schedule page. No exams or quizzes of any kind may be given during the last week of a course, including both on-campus or online courses. However, please note that this policy does not extend to labs even if the lab is graded and has components of a quiz associated with the lab experience. All courses are assigned a final examination time within the final examination week. Take-home final exams must use the specified final exam period as the last possible time that the take-home exam may be turned in. In courses where papers or projects rather than a final examination constitute the last evaluation activity, instructors may use the scheduled final exam period as the due date for the project/paper. Instructors also may use the final examination period to meet with students to discuss the papers/projects. Information on the use of the final examination period and its duration should be told to students as soon as possible. Instructors should still put as much information about the final exam as possible in the syllabus, including its duration and a reminder to students not to plan travel until the exam date and time is announced. **Test Modifications for Students with Disabilities** The Engelsiz Bakırçay Office, can help instructors arrange appropriate modifications for students with disabilities while protecting academic standards. Staff members have access to the confidential information needed to make determinations of the appropriateness of testing modifications; they have experience in determining specific classroom modifications and can suggest approaches that have proved to be fair and equitable.
# GP Guide Appendix E **Processes, Policies, and Procedures for the courses of 
MIS 411 Graduation Project I and MIS 412 Graduation Project II** As of January 12, 2022 **1. Introduction** The MIS Graduation Project courses, MIS 411 (18 ECTS) and MIS 412 (18 ECTS) are parts of a group research or design project that students pursue under the guidance of a department mentor. Graduation projects may include, but are not limited to, an entrepreneurship project, a real-world case study, a written assessment of a community-learning initiative, or a design project accompanied by an analytic essay (comprising background, aims, and technique) according to study area of the group's mentor. All questions about the graduation project(s) should be directed to the related department mentor. Students interested in undertaking MIS 405 and MIS 406 should read all sections of the policy and procedures before submitting a proposal. **2. Planning** Graduation projects are student-generated. Generally they are an opportunity to continue a sustained line of inquiry that the students have already begun. A graduation project may grow out of a piece of work (an application production, a technology design, a real-world case study, a creative writing piece, a CLI project, etc.) a student has done in a course, tutorial, or independent study. It may also derive from questions or ideas spurred by a student’s meeting/colloquium. Successful graduation projects will involve significant preparation. As such students interested in pursuing a graduation project are strongly encouraged to consult with their mentors early in their undergraduate program in order to plan for appropriate coursework and research well in advance. **3. Timing** Graduation Project I (MIS 411) may only be undertaken in the fall semesters and Graduation Project II (MIS 412) may only be undertaken in the spring semesters. Generally, students will complete graduation projects in their final year at MIS Department. In rare cases, students may complete their graduation projects in their penultimate year. Students planning to graduate in June should plan to complete senior projects in the preceding year. **4. Credits** The MIS 411 Graduation Project I is a eight-ECTS-credit course of study and MIS 412 Graduation Project II is a ten-ECTS-credit course of study, requiring a minimum of eight and ten contact hours respectively between student group and department mentor during the course of the convening semester. The arrangement of contact hours will vary depending on the needs of the specific project and the students’ level of progress. **5. Requirements** While expectations for graduation projects will differ depending on the nature of the work undertaken, certain minimum standards apply generally. In particular, all graduation projects require a written component; in general, graduation projects should be accompanied by essays of substantial depth and length that address the project’s background (locating students’ projects within a larger design context), design aims (articulating students’ goals in mounting a particular project, and explaining how the actual project met those goals), and technical issues (such as technology chosen, infrastructure design, content creation, structural elements, etc), as determined and developed in consultation with department mentors. Projects should follow appropriate academic standards of documentation, argumentation, and analysis. All projects will be individually assessed by department mentors on their own merits mentioned in the section 9. Evaluation. **6. Mentors** Student groups arrange to execute their graduation projects under the guidance of an MIS faculty member. In most cases, students are already acquainted with the department mentor who will be supervising the study. The department mentor should help the student clarify the graduation project proposal to ensure that it includes all necessary components. In the semesters that the graduation project is undertaken, department mentors meet regularly with the student to discuss readings and progress, as well as provide feedback on the development of the final product. At the end of the term, department mentors submit anecdotal grade reports that briefly describe and provide a final evaluation of the student group’s work to accompany the assignment of a letter grade. Department members are limited to supervising no more than one graduation project per semester. **7. Proposal** Only complete proposals will be considered. A complete graduation project proposal will include the following elements: a. Project Description: The description should be approximately three double spaced pages, and should clearly state the proposed research question or design aim(s) of the project. The proposal must explain how the student group has prepared to carry out this project and how the students intend to complete the project within one semester. The project’s relation to the students’ ongoing work or area of concentration should be clear. The proposal should also clearly specify the expected output (i.e., a research paper, design project, real-world case) and discuss the specific methods with which the project will be completed. These criteria will be determined between the student group and the department mentor, and they will be used in evaluating the final project at the end of the semester. b. Annotated Bibliography or Relevant Works: The bibliography should situate a student’s project within a body of work in their field. This should include books, articles, key documents, applications, cases, etc. Please provide the full citation and a short description of the relevance of each text or work to the proposed project (preferably in APA style). c. Form: Complete Graduation Project Proposal Form. **8. Registration** Proposals will be reviewed with an eye toward selecting projects of exceptional promise. The department mentor will evaluate proposals based on the following criteria: * clarity of project goal(s), mode of inquiry, and final product * project’s relation to concentration and course of study * feasibility of the project within one semester through an articulated timeline * clear articulation of student group/mentor relationship, including schedule of meetings * the degree to which the project would culminate in an original design or scholarly work Please note that students are responsible for the course registration process. **9. Evaluation** Each graduation project will be evaluated by the department mentor for its ability to meet project aims as delineated in the project proposal as well as the degree to which the final product exemplifies original interdisciplinary work. Successful completion of the graduation graduation will be noted in two ways: (1) each student in the group will receive a letter grade awarded by the department mentor for the courses titled “MIS 405 Graduation Project I” and “MIS 406 Graduation Project II.” (2) all graduation projects will also receive written evaluations from department mentors, submitted to the Chair's Office of MIS Department. **10. Deadlines** Graduation project proposals and final projects must be submitted according to the following firm schedule of submission deadlines: Semester of MIS 411 Graduation Project I: Fall Graduation project proposal due: The last day of the third week of the semester Graduation project is due: In Final Exam period of the semester. -Exact date will be announced- Semester of MIS 412 Graduation Project II: Spring Graduation project proposal due: The last day of the third week of the semester Graduation project is due: In Final Exam period of the semester. -Exact date will be announced- **11. Student Checklist** Complete the following by the appropriate deadlines: a. Approximately two weeks prior to the proposal submission deadline * Consult the GP Guide website for information and policies on designing your study. * Identify and contact the department mentor with whom you would like to work. * Discuss your group's graduation project plans with your mentor. * Develop the description of the study and the annotated bibliography or relevant works. b. Approximately one week prior to the proposal submission deadline * Complete the Graduation Project Proposal Form, which will be sent to your group department mentor. * Within a few days of submission of the form, follow up with your mentor to make sure he or she has received the proposal. c. Approximately one day prior to the proposal submission deadline * Confirm with mentor that he or she has submitted his or her approval to MIS Department. * If you have not received confirmation from your mentor that he or she has approved your proposal, contact your mentor. Do not wait until the submission deadline to notify MIS Department for problems. **12. Proposal Form** * Student Group Number * Name, Surname and Student ID for each student in the student group * Year and Semester of Registration, Expected Graduation Year and Month for each student in the group * Undertaken ECTS credits in the semester for each student in the group * Rationale Status (Not submitted, Submitted, Approved, Rejected and in Revision) * Department Mentor Name and Surname * Department Mentor E-mail * Title of the Senior Project * Project Description * Annotated Bibliography or Relevant Works **13. Mentor List** Prof. H. Kemal İlter, Ph.D. Prof. Erman Coşkun, Ph.D. Prof. Abdulkadir Hızıroğlu, Ph.D. Assoc. Prof. Onur Doğan, Ph.D. Assoc. Prof. Emine Uçar, Ph.D. Asst. Prof. Ourania Areta Hızıroğlu, Ph.D. Asst. Prof. Hunaida Avvad, Ph.D. Asst. Prof. Fares Dael, Ph.D. Asst. Prof. Serhat Peker, Ph.D. **14. Mentor Selection** Graduation project student groups are established and their group members are selected by the MIS Department. Here is the selection process: Step 1. Establishing a group (5-student group). Step 2. Indicating group choices for mentors (3 options: First, Second, and Third). Step 3. Scoring group's mentor selection (10 for First, 8 for Second, 6 for Third, 4 for other mentors). Step 4. Creating an assignment problem for matching groups and mentors. Step 5. Solving the problem to maximize group's satisfaction (maximization of overall satisfaction).

Solution process.

Step 6. Assigning groups to mentors. # GT Guide Appendix F **Processes, Policies, and Procedures for the course of MIS 429 Thesis for Bachelor's Program** As of October 12, 2023 Introduction The Thesis for Bachelor's Program course, MIS 429 (6 ECTS) has a mission of an academic career for undergraduate students. Under the supervision of the assigned mentor, students are expected to conduct a scientific research study, report it based on the academic writing rules and principles, and finally, present it in a seminar. Students interested in undertaking MIS 429 should read all sections of the policy and procedures before submitting a proposal. Planning Theses are independent studies. A thesis may grow out of an idea or an understanding of a real-world problem. Successful theses will involve significant preparation. As such students interested in pursuing a thesis are strongly encouraged to consult with their mentors early in their undergraduate program in order to plan for appropriate coursework and research well in advance. Timing Thesis for Bachelor's Program may only be undertaken in the spring semesters. Generally, students will complete these in their final year at MIS Department. Students planning to graduate in June should plan to complete thesis in the preceding year. Credits The MIS 429 Thesis for Bachelor's Program is a fourteen-ECTS-credit course of study, requiring a minimum of eight and ten contact hours respectively between student and department mentor during the course of the convening semester. The arrangement of contact hours will vary depending on the needs of the specific thesis and the students’ level of progress. Requirements While expectations for theses will differ depending on the nature of the work undertaken, certain minimum standards apply generally. In particular, all theses require a written component as determined and developed in consultation with department mentors. Theses should follow appropriate academic standards of documentation, argumentation, and analysis. All theses will be individually assessed by department mentors on their own merits mentioned in the section 9. Evaluation. Mentors Students arrange to execute their theses under the guidance of an MIS faculty member. In most cases, students are already acquainted with the department mentor who will be supervising the study. The department mentor should help the student clarify the thesis proposal to ensure that it includes all necessary components. In the semesters that the thesis is undertaken, department mentors meet regularly with the student to discuss readings and progress, as well as provide feedback on the development of the final product. At the end of the semester, department mentors submit anecdotal grade reports that briefly describe and provide a final evaluation of the student’s work to accompany the assignment of a letter grade. Department members are limited to supervising no more than one thesis per semester. Proposal Only complete proposals will be considered. A complete thesis proposal will include the following elements: a. Thesis Description: The description should be approximately three double spaced pages, and should clearly state the proposed research question of the project. The proposal must explain how the student has prepared to carry out this thesis and how the student intend to complete the thesis within one semester. The thesis’ relation to the students’ ongoing work or area of concentration should be clear. The proposal should also clearly specify the expected output (i.e., a research paper, a conference proceeding) and discuss the specific methods with which the thesis will be completed. These criteria will be determined between the student and the department mentor, and they will be used in evaluating the final thesis at the end of the semester. b. Annotated Bibliography or Relevant Works: The bibliography should situate a student’s thesis within a body of work in their field. This should include books, articles, key documents, applications, cases, etc. Please provide the full citation and a short description of the relevance of each text or work to the proposed project (preferably in APA style). c. Form: Complete Thesis Proposal Form. Proposals will be reviewed with an eye toward selecting projects of exceptional promise. The department mentor will evaluate proposals based on the following criteria: clarity of project goal(s), mode of inquiry, and final product thesis’ relation to concentration and course of study feasibility of the thesis within one semester through an articulated timeline clear articulation of student/mentor relationship, including schedule of meetings the degree to which the project would culminate in an original design or scholarly work Registration Please note that students are responsible for the course registration process. Evaluation Each thesis will be evaluated by the department mentor for its ability to meet thesis aims as delineated in the thesis proposal as well as the degree to which the final product exemplifies original interdisciplinary work. Successful completion of the thesis will be noted in two ways: (1) student will receive a letter grade awarded by the department mentor for the courses titled “MIS 429 Thesis for Bachelor's Program,” (2) all theses will also receive written evaluations from department mentors, submitted to the Chair's Office of MIS Department. Deadlines Thesis proposals and final theses must be submitted according to the following firm schedule of submission deadlines: Semester of MIS 429 Thesis for Bachelor's Program: Spring Thesis proposal due: The last day of the third week of the semester Thesis is due: In Final Exam period of the semester. -Exact date will be announced- Student Checklist Complete the following by the appropriate deadlines: a. Approximately two weeks prior to the proposal submission deadline Consult the GT Guide website for information and policies on designing your study. Identify and contact the department mentor with whom you would like to work. Discuss thesis plans with your mentor. Develop the description of the study and the annotated bibliography or relevant works. b. Approximately one week prior to the proposal submission deadline Complete the Thesis Proposal Form, which will be sent to your department mentor. Within a few days of submission of the form, follow up with your mentor to make sure he or she has received the proposal. c. Approximately one day prior to the proposal submission deadline Confirm with mentor that he or she has submitted his or her approval to MIS Department. If you have not received confirmation from your mentor that he or she has approved your proposal, contact your mentor. Do not wait until the submission deadline to notify MIS Department for problems. Proposal Form Name, Surname and Student ID for the student Year and semester of registration, expected graduation year and month for the student Undertaken ECTS credits in the semester for the student Mentor Name and Surname Mentor E-mail Title of the thesis Thesis description Annotated bibliography or relevant works **13. Mentor List** Prof. H. Kemal İlter, Ph.D. Prof. Erman Coşkun, Ph.D. Prof. Abdulkadir Hızıroğlu, Ph.D. Assoc. Prof. Onur Doğan, Ph.D. Assoc. Prof. Emine Uçar, Ph.D. Asst. Prof. Ourania Areta Hızıroğlu, Ph.D. Asst. Prof. Hunaida Avvad, Ph.D. Asst. Prof. Fares Dael, Ph.D. Asst. Prof. Serhat Peker, Ph.D. **14. Mentor Selection** Thesis students are selected by the MIS Department. Here is the selection process: Step 1. Indicating your choices for mentors (2 options: First, and Second). Step 2. Scoring student's mentor selection (10 for First, 8 for Second, 4 for other mentors). Step 3. Creating an [assignment problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assignment_problem/) for matching students and mentors. Step 4. Solving the problem to maximize student's satisfaction (maximization of overall satisfaction). Step 5. Assigning student to mentors.

Solution process.

Step 6. Assigning groups to mentors. # Course Evaluation Form Appendix G As of January 5, 2022 This form is provided for the purpose of evaluation for MIS courses you registered. Please select appropriate option of each statement which correspond most closely to your desired response according to the scale below. 1\. Strongly Disagree — 2. Disagree — 3. Undecided — 4. Agree — 5. Strongly Agree Thank you for your participation. — Department of Management Information Systems **General** 1\. Which course do you want to evaluate? **Global Items** 2\. This course is well planned and organized. 3\. The content of this course is valuable. 4\. This instructor is effective in teaching the subject matter of this course. 5\. I would recommend a course taught by this instructor to other students. **Course Content, Objectives, and Structure** 6\. The pace of this course is appropriate. 7\. Presentations are interesting and challenging. 8\. This course is intellectually stimulating. 9\. Facts and concepts from related fields are presented. 10\. Classes are worth attending. **Instructor’s Behavior** 11\. This instructor responds respectfully to student questions and viewpoints. 12\. This instructor creates an atmosphere where ideas can be exchanged freely and easily. 13\. Class discussions are helpful to my learning. 14\. This instructor communicates at a level appropriate to my understanding. 15\. Help is available outside class if I have questions. **Communication Skills** 16\. This instructor communicates well. 17\. This instructor speaks clearly and audibly. 18\. This instructor presents materials clearly. 19\. This instructor’s facility with the language of instruction is good. **Instructional Methods and Materials** 20\. Required course activities are important to my learning. 21\. Required course activities are consistent with course objectives. 22\. The course web page was a valuable resource. 23\. Assigned homework reinforced material presented in class. 24\. Material is summarized in a manner that helps me learn. **Outcomes of Instruction** 25\. My critical thinking skills have improved because of this class. 26\. My problem solving abilities have improved because of this class. 27\. I have learned to see relationships among important topics and ideas. 28\. I have been motivated to do additional work in this area. 29\. This course is so interesting that I would like to take another class in this area. **Comments and Recommendations** # Lisansüstü Danışmanlık Appendix H As of March 10, 2022 ÖNEMLİ: İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi'ne bağlı olan Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Bölümü, enstitü açısından Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü'ne bağlı bir Anabilim Dalı olarak tanımlanır. ## A. Prosedür 1. Lisansüstü programlara yeni kayıt olan öğrenciler ilk yarıyıl kayıtları sırasında Danışman Tercih Formu, MF#5 doldurur. **Ek bilgi:** Danışman Tercih Formu, MF#5 doldurmayan öğrenciler için danışman ataması anabilim dalı başkanlığınca yapılır. 2. Önceden kayıtlı öğrenciler, anabilim dalındaki başka bir öğretim üyesiyle çalışmayı arzu etmeleri durumunda, yarıyıl kayıtları sırasında Danışman Değişiklik Formu, MF#6 doldurur. **Ek bilgi:** Danışman Değişiklik Formu, MF#6 doldurmayan öğrenciler mevcut danışmanıyla çalışmaya devam eder. 3. Yeni kayıt olan öğrenciler ile danışman değişikliği isteyen öğrencilerin danışmanları en geç ekle-sil dönemi sonuna kadar anabilim dalı başkanlığınca atanır. (bkz. §C)\ **Ek bilgi:** Kayıt döneminden sonra danışman değişikliği isteyen öğrencilerin başvuruları sonraki yarıyıl başında değerlendirilir. 4. Sonrakiyarıyıldatez(veyaproje)çalışmasıyapacaköğrenciler,mevcutyarıyılsonundakiyarıyıl sonu sınav tarihlerinin son gününe kadar tez (veya proje) başlığını ve konusunu içeren Tez Önerisi Formu, MF#7 veya Proje Önerisi Formu, MF#8 doldurur.\ **Ek bilgi:** İlgili formu zamanında teslim etmeyen öğrenciler tez veya proje çalışmasına başlayamazlar. 5. Öğretim üyesinin talep ettiği danışmanlık değişikliklerinde ilgili öğrencinin başka bir danışmana atanabilmesi için, öğrencinin diğer bir danışmanla anlaşarak Danışman Değişiklik Formu, MF#6 doldurması gerekir. **Ek bilgi:** Danışman Değişiklik Formu, MF#6 doldurmayan öğrenciler için danışman ataması anabilim dalı başkanlığınca yapılır. ## B. Danışmanlığa Bağlı Dersler ve Oluşturdukları Yük **Tezli Yüksek Lisans** * Tezli yüksek lisans programında danışmanlık yapan öğretim üyesi için —danışmanlık yaptığı öğrenci sayısından bağımsız olarak— Uzmanlık Alan Dersi (MIS 803, 6 AKTS veya MIS 804, 6 AKTS | 6 saat/hafta) açılır. Bu ders öğrencinin kayıtlı kaldığı tüm eğitim süresi boyunca açık kalır. * Tezli yüksek lisans programında tez danışmanlığı yapan öğretim üyesi için danışmanlık sayısı kadar Yüksek Lisans Tezi dersi (MIS 801, 24 AKTS veya MIS 802, 24 AKTS | 1 saat/hafta) açılır. Bu ders öğrencilerin kayıtlı kaldığı tüm tez dönemi boyunca açık kalır. Ders uygulamalı ders kategorisinde olduğundan öğretim üyesi için ek yük en yüksek 10 saat/hafta kadar olabilir. * Tezli yüksek lisans programında danışmanlık yapan öğretim üyesi için tez öğrencisinin derslerinin biteceği son yarıyılda Seminer dersi (MIS 515, 10 AKTS | 2 saat/hafta) açılır. **Tezsiz Yüksek Lisans** * Tezsiz yüksek lisans programında proje danışmanlığı yapan öğretim üyelerine Bitirme Projesi Çalışması dersi (IZV 592, 30 AKTS | 1 saat/hafta) açılır. **Doktora** * Doktora programında danışmanlık yapan öğretim üyesi için —danışmanlık yaptığı öğrenci sayısından bağımsız olarak— Uzmanlık Alan Dersi (MIS 901, 6 AKTS | 6 saat/hafta) açılır. Bu ders öğrencinin kayıtlı kaldığı tüm eğitim süresi boyunca açık kalır. * Doktora programında danışmanlık yapan öğretim üyesi için tez danışmanlığı sayısı kadar Doktora Tezi dersi (MIS 900, 24 AKTS | 1 saat/hafta) açılır. Bu ders öğrencilerin kayıtlı kaldığı tüm tez dönemi boyunca açık kalır. Ders uygulamalı ders kategorisinde olduğundan öğretim üyesi için ek yük en yüksek 10 saat/hafta kadar olabilir. * Doktora programında danışmanlık yapan öğretim üyesi için tez öğrencisinin derslerinin biteceği son yarıyılda Seminer dersi (MIS 614, 10 AKTS | 2 saat/hafta) açılır. ## C. Danışmanlık Ataması ve Danışmanlık Yüklerinin Belirlenmesi Lisansüstü programlara yeni kayıt olan öğrencilere danışman atanmasında; 1. Öğrencinin Danışman Tercih Formu'nda (MF#5) belirttiği çalışma alanı tercihi veya çalışmayı tercih ettiği öğretim üyesi, 2. Öğretim üyelerinin anabilim dalındaki danışmanlık yükleri dikkate alınır. Önceden kayıtlı öğrencilerin danışman değişikliklerinde; 1. Öğrencinin Danışman Değişiklik Formu'nda, MF#6 belirttiği çalışmasını birlikte sürdürmeyi tercih ettiği öğretim üyesi, 2. Öğretim üyelerinin anabilim dalındaki danışmanlık yükleri dikkate alınır. Lisansüstü danışmanlıklar, öğretim üyesinin ilgili programda ders vermesinden bağımsızdır ve yalnızca Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Anabilim Dalı'ndaki öğretim üyelerine atanır. *** **Bağlantılar** * Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, * Lisansüstü resmi doküman, * Basılı formlar, * MF#05 Danışman Tercih Formu, * MF#06 Danışman Değişiklik Formu, in development * MF#07 Tez Önerisi Formu, in development * MF#08 Proje Önerisi Formu, in development # MIS 421 Internship Appendix I **MIS 421 Internship dersine ilişkin bilgilendirme** * Staj 2. sınıftan ders aldıktan sonraki veya 3. sınıftan ders aldıktan sonraki yaz döneminde -sigortanın üniversite tarafından yapılması durumunda- en fazla bir defa yapılır. MADDE 6.3 * Staj öncesinde İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği sertifikası alınması gerekir. MADDE 6.2 * Staj en az 20 işgünü ve en çok 48 işgünüdür. MADDE 7.1 * Başvuru formu işletmeden onay alınarak doldurulur ve bölüm başkanlığına teslim edilir. Staj yapılacak işletmeyi öğrenci bulur. MADDE 11 * Başvurular bölüm staj komisyonu tarafından değerlendirilir. MADDE 5 * Yapılan stajın değerlendirilmesi denetçi öğretim üyesi tarafından yapılır. MADDE 10 * Staj dersi son bahar yarıyılında (düzenli öğrenciler için sekizinci yarıyılda) seçilerek transcript'e eklenir. MADDE 6.1 * Staj dersi seçmeli ders statüsünde olduğundan (6 AKTS) başarılı olarak tamamlandıktan sonra diğer bir seçmeli ders yerine saydırılabilir.\ **Not:** Resmi dokümanda bunu engelleyen bir madde olmamasına rağmen 8. yarıyılda transcript'e eklendiğinden bir problem yaratabilir. Doğruluğu için onay bekleniyor. * Staj ile ilgili olarak işletme bulmakta zorluk çeken veya konuya ilişkin sorusu olan öğrencilerin bölüm başkanlığı ile iletişim kurması süreci hızlandıracaktır.
Yukarıdaki bilgi **STAJ** sürecine ilişkin bir özet niteliğindedir. Yürürlükte olan orijinal dokümanlar ve formlar için şu linklere bakınız: * [İzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesi İİBF Staj Dersi Usul ve Esasları](https://isletme.bakircay.edu.tr/Yuklenenler/Staj_Dersi_Usul_ve_Esaslar%C4%B1.docx) * [Formlar](https://ybs.bakircay.edu.tr/Sayfalar/995/staj) # MIS 436 Vocational Business Training Appendix J İME'nin (İşletmede Mesleki Eğitim) amacı öğrencilere (MADDE 1); * Bilgi ve deneyimlerini pekiştirme imkânı sağlamak, * İşyerlerini, organizasyon yapılarını tanıtmak, * İş disiplini kazandırmak, * Bölümde edindikleri bilgileri uygulamada kullanabilme becerisi kazandırmak, * İstihdam edilebilirliklerini arttırmak, * Takım ruhu içinde birlikte iş yapabilme alışkanlığı kazandırmaktır. **MIS 436 Vocational Business Training dersine ilişkin bilgilendirme** * İME son bahar yarıyılında (düzenli öğrenciler için sekizinci yarıyılda) 14 hafta süreyle yapılır. MADDE 5 * İME'ne %80 oranında devam zorunludur. MADDE 6 * İME bölüm komisyonu tarafından belirlenen ve duyurulan ölçütlere uygun işletmelerde yapılır. MADDE 7 * İME'ye kaydolan öğrenci devam zorunluluğu olan bir başka derse kayıt yaptıramaz. MADDE 8 * İME'nin yapılacağı işletmenin bulunması öğrencinin sorumluluğundadır. MADDE 10 * Yarıyıl içinde bir ara raporun ve yarıyıl sonunda bir nihai raporun teslim edilmesi gerekir. * İME ile ilgili olarak işletme bulmakta zorluk çeken veya konuya ilişkin sorusu olan öğrencilerin bölüm başkanlığı ile iletişim kurması süreci hızlandıracaktır.
Yukarıdaki bilgi İME sürecine ilişkin bir özet niteliğindedir. Yürürlükte olan orijinal dokümanlar ve formlar için şu linklere bakınız: * [İzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesi İİBF İşletmede Mesleki Eğitim Dersi Usul ve Esasları](https://isletme.bakircay.edu.tr/Yuklenenler/%C4%B0ME_Dersi_Usul_ve_Esaslar%C4%B1.docx) * [Formlar](https://ybs.bakircay.edu.tr/Sayfalar/3115/isletmede-mesleki-egitim)